From 1882 Jewish immigration onwards, trace how competing nationalisms, great-power intervention, and structural inequalities shaped the Israeli-Palestinian conflict into its present form. Understand the major turning points—the Nakba, the 1967 occupation, successive uprisings, and failed peace processes—that make current events legible through historical layers.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one of the most closely watched, most fiercely debated, and most persistently unresolved geopolitical disputes of the modern era. News coverage of it is relentless. Opinions about it are intense. Yet for many people — even highly educated, politically engaged people — the actual history beneath the headlines remains murky. This course is designed to fix that. Its central premise is straightforward: the conflict is not a timeless or inevitable clash between two peoples. It is the product of specific decisions, historical forces, and structural conditions that can be traced, understood, and analyzed. Your goal by the end is not to have chosen a side, but to understand how we got here.
The course begins in 1882, the year of the First Aliyah — the first organized wave of Jewish immigration to Ottoman Palestine. This is not an arbitrary starting point. It marks the moment when Zionist ideology (the movement for Jewish political self-determination) began translating from idea into practice on the ground. Before 1882, there was a region called Palestine with an existing population, an Ottoman administrative structure, and a small pre-existing Jewish community. After 1882, you begin to see the collision of forces — immigration, land purchase, competing nationalisms, and great-power politics — that would eventually produce the state of Israel, the Palestinian refugee crisis, and the conflict as it exists today.
The course ends in the present, which means it includes the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel and the subsequent Israeli military campaign in Gaza — events still unfolding and still being interpreted as you read this.
This course is organized as a cumulative historical argument: each period builds on what came before, and the present becomes legible only if you understand the layers beneath it. Think of it less like a timeline of isolated events and more like a geological cross-section — the surface conditions reflect decades of accumulated strata.
Here is a compressed map of the territory:
1882–1917 — The Late Ottoman Period and the Origins of Zionism. European Jewish immigration begins, driven by persecution and shaped by political Zionism. Palestine is an Ottoman province with a predominantly Arab population that becomes increasingly aware of and anxious about the new arrivals.
1917–1948 — The British Mandate Era. World War I reshapes the Middle East. Britain issues the Balfour Declaration (1917), promising support for a Jewish national home in Palestine while claiming to protect Arab rights — a contradiction it was never able to resolve. The interwar decades are marked by escalating immigration, land conflict, Arab revolt, and, crucially, the Holocaust, which transforms the urgency of Jewish statehood. Britain eventually hands the problem to the United Nations.
1948 — The Founding War. Israel declares independence; Arab armies invade; Israel wins and expands beyond the UN-proposed partition boundaries. Approximately 700,000 Palestinian Arabs flee or are expelled — an event Palestinians call the Nakba (catastrophe). The refugee question, born here, has never been resolved.
1948–1967 — State-Building and Regional Conflict. Israel consolidates as a state, absorbing massive waves of Jewish immigration. Palestinians in Israel live under military administration. Regional Arab nationalism reshapes the political environment. The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) is founded in 1964.
1967 — The Six-Day War and the Occupation. In six days, Israel captures the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Sinai Peninsula, and Golan Heights. The occupation of the West Bank and Gaza begins — and continues to this day. This war is arguably the single most consequential turning point in the modern history of the conflict.
1973–1993 — Wars, Uprisings, and the Road to Oslo. The 1973 war leads eventually to the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty (1979). The First Intifada (1987–1993) — a Palestinian uprising in the occupied territories — forces a political reckoning and leads directly to the Oslo Accords.
1993–2000 — The Oslo Peace Process. The Oslo Accords create the Palestinian Authority and establish a framework for a two-state solution. But settlement construction continues, the process stalls, and final-status talks collapse at Camp David in 2000.
2000–2007 — The Second Intifada and Its Aftermath. A second, far bloodier uprising reshapes Israeli and Palestinian societies. Yasser Arafat dies; Mahmoud Abbas succeeds him. Israel withdraws from Gaza in 2005. Hamas wins Palestinian elections in 2006 and seizes control of Gaza in 2007, splitting Palestinian political representation.
2007–2023 — The Gaza Blockade, Settlement Expansion, and Successive Wars. Israel and Egypt impose a blockade on Gaza. Israel and Hamas fight repeated rounds of armed conflict. Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank reaches over 700,000 settlers. The Abraham Accords (2020) normalize relations between Israel and several Arab states, largely sidelining the Palestinian issue.
2023–Present — October 7 and the Gaza War. Hamas's attack on October 7, 2023, kills approximately 1,200 Israelis and takes some 250 hostages. Israel launches a massive military campaign in Gaza. Palestinian deaths surpass 50,000. International legal proceedings, including at the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court, are opened. The conflict enters one of its most acute phases since 1948.
A simplified timeline of the major eras covered in this course, from the First Aliyah in 1882 to the present. Turning-point events (wars, the Nakba) are distinguished from the longer eras of political and diplomatic development.
One of the most important things to understand before you begin is that historical interpretation of this conflict is itself contested. This is not simply a matter of political bias — it reflects genuine disagreement about what happened, why it happened, and what it means.
The dominant Zionist narrative emphasizes the ancient Jewish connection to the land of Israel, the existential necessity of statehood in the face of centuries of persecution culminating in the Holocaust, and Israel's right to security as a sovereign state. The Palestinian narrative emphasizes the displacement of an indigenous population, the colonial character of the Zionist project, the injustice of the Nakba, and the denial of Palestinian self-determination under occupation. These are not simply opposing propaganda lines — they represent fundamentally different frameworks for understanding the same events, and they draw on different bodies of evidence and different moral premises.
This course will introduce you to both narratives, help you understand where they diverge and why, and distinguish between what is genuinely contested and what is well-established across scholarly perspectives. From the 1980s onward, a generation of Israeli historians — often called the New Historians (including Benny Morris, Avi Shlaim, and Ilan Pappé) — used newly declassified Israeli archives to challenge aspects of the official Israeli account of 1948. Their work has enriched and complicated the historical record. You will encounter it throughout this course.
Being able to hold competing narratives in mind simultaneously — not in the sense of treating all claims as equally valid, but in the sense of understanding what each narrative is actually claiming and why — is one of the key intellectual skills this course will help you develop.
Rather than presenting the conflict as a series of events, it helps to identify the structural tensions that run through the entire period:
Two nationalisms claiming the same land. Political Zionism and Palestinian Arab nationalism both emerged in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, each asserting the primacy of their people's claim to the same territory. Neither claim is unintelligible; neither is uncontested.
The role of great-power politics. The conflict has never been purely local. The Ottoman Empire, Britain, the United States, the Soviet Union, and regional powers have all shaped events in ways that frequently overrode the preferences of the people actually living in Palestine. Britain's contradictory promises during World War I are an early and paradigmatic example.
The gap between international resolutions and on-the-ground realities. The United Nations has produced numerous resolutions bearing on the conflict — Resolution 181 (partition), Resolution 194 (refugees), Resolution 242 (withdrawal from occupied territories). These resolutions have repeatedly failed to translate into durable political arrangements, and disagreement about how to interpret them remains central to the conflict.
The asymmetry of power. Since 1948, and especially since 1967, Israel has been the militarily dominant power and the occupying authority over millions of Palestinians who have no state and no sovereignty. This asymmetry shapes every aspect of the conflict and is a central feature of the Palestinian narrative.
This course is not a polemic for either side. It does not conclude that Israel's founding was illegitimate or that Palestinian grievances are manufactured. It does not conclude that Israeli security concerns are fabricated or that Palestinian violence is inexplicable. It proceeds from the conviction that the conflict becomes more, not less, comprehensible the more carefully it is examined — and that this comprehension is a prerequisite for any serious engagement with proposals for its resolution.
You will finish this course having traced the full arc of the conflict from its origins to the present. You will understand the major turning points and why they matter. You will be able to follow debates about the conflict — in newspapers, policy papers, or conversations — with a level of historical grounding that most participants in those debates lack. The conflict will remain unresolved when you finish, because it is. But it will no longer be mysterious.